Post
 Posted By: KYHeirloomer 
Jul 8  # 26 of 66
Somebody want to explain to me how generic vinegar differs from Heinz's? Or even from Kroger's house brand?
Post
 Posted By: chubbyalaskagriz 
Jul 8  # 27 of 66
I can't say there is a difference other than the pretty label. In commercial kitchens we used "Distilled Vinegar". No fancy names. Every recipe turned out just as good.

Of course we used other viinegars too- and they tended to have actual name-brands and labels, but they tended to at least appear to be more obscure, less-often heard of names.
Post
 Posted By: KYHeirloomer 
Jul 8  # 28 of 66
That was my very point, Chubby. White vinegar, at 5% acidity, is white vinegar, and it doesn't matter what name is on the label.

I think this was just another case of food snobbery on the part of the original poster---who'd Aunt Agness made no such differentiation.

I get pretty testy when I run into that sort of snottiness. To be sure, there are times when price and label do make a difference in quality. But it's not universally true by any means. Indeed, sometimes the low-priced spread is actually better than the high-end, much touted brand. And sometimes price is the only difference---as with white vinegar.

In those cases, only a fool or a snob would opt away from the generic, IMO.
Post
 Posted By: CanMan 
Jul 8  # 29 of 66
There's not that much of a difference, other than perhaps flavor, like for salads. Some of your generic vinegars are a little harsher, but work great for pickling. But you need to taste them. Price is not always the quality.

Distilled White Vinegar and Apple Cider Vinegar are regulated today to 5% acidity and most other vinegars are fairly close to that same level. Our grandparents used to use vinegars that were from 7% to 18% or more (homemade), which is another reason why old recipes should not be used. It would not be acidic enough to be safe.
Post
 Posted By: KYHeirloomer 
Jul 8  # 30 of 66
CanMan, there are lots of reasons why old-time canning methods and recipes might not be safe. But the way you phrased it could be misleading.

A vinegar that's 18% acidic is more than three-times as acidic as modern store-bought stuff. So, presuming the old-time recipe cut back on the amount of vinegar, then modern stuff could, indeed, be too weak.

However, that wasn't usually the case. Back in the day they preferred a sharper, more sour taste then we do today. And so, in terms of quantitites, there was much more vinegar in the pickling brine then there is in modern recipes. In addition, they were less likely to cut it with water.

So much so that we would likely find their pickles to be nearly inedible.

Here, for instance, is Mary Randolph's 1823 recipe:

"To Pickle Cucumbers:

Gather them full grown, but quite young--take off the green rind, and slice them tolerably thick; put a layer in a deep dish, strew over it some chopped onion and salt; do this until they are all in; sprinkle salt on the top, let them stand six hours, put them in a colander---when all the liquor has runoff, put them in a pot, strew a little cayenne pepper over each layer, and cover them with strong cold vinegar; when the pot is full, pour on some sweet oil and tie it up close; at the end of a fortnight, pour off the first vinegar and put in fresh"

Mary Randolph's vinegar would likely have tested at 20%.

Once you translate that into modern English, the Ball Blue Book has a recipe that is virtually the same. Only significant difference is that the BBB calls for 2 cups of modern (5%) vinegar mixed with two gallons of water. Which makes for a pretty thin brine, compared to Ms Randolph's. And the vinegar isn't changed after two weeks.

Just for the record, that works out at .125% acidity, and Ball is counting on the salt to perform a lactic acid fermentation. However, if you followed Randolph's recipe, using modern vinegar, you would have 5% acidity working along with the salt for the same lactic acid fermentation. And you'd be refreshing the acid as well.

The general rule of thumb, in modern canning, is to mix up to one cup of water with one cup of vinegar. Which means you can dilute it to about 2.5% and still have what every food scientist in the world considers a safe acid level. That being the case, there is nothing unsafe about the Randolph recipe. Nor many---perhaps most---old time recipes.

The trick is understanding the processes involved, rather than slavishly following the mandates of a government agency that has proven itself inept time after time.